Currently in beta · We’re starting with OCD in California. More conditions and states are coming. · Currently in beta · We’re starting with OCD in California. More conditions and states are coming.Currently in beta · We’re starting with OCD in California. More conditions and states are coming. · Currently in beta · We’re starting with OCD in California. More conditions and states are coming.

How we evaluate providers

Every provider is scored on a 100-point scale across five evidence-based signals. These signals are weighted by importance — ERP use matters most because it’s the single strongest predictor of treatment success.

ERP Use

Highest weight

Whether the provider uses Exposure and Response Prevention as their primary treatment for OCD. This is the gold standard, and providers who don't use it are unlikely to deliver effective OCD care.

OCD Caseload

High weight

What percentage of the provider's practice is dedicated to OCD patients. A provider who sees 2 OCD patients a month is not a specialist, regardless of their training.

Training

Moderate weight

Specialized OCD training beyond general clinical education. This includes BTTI certification, postdoctoral fellowships at OCD programs, or documented mentorship under recognized OCD specialists.

Clinical Fit

Moderate weight

How well the provider's specialty areas and treatment intensity match common OCD presentations. Providers who offer intensive programs or specialize in severe cases score higher.

Degree

Lower weight

Level and relevance of the provider's clinical degree. This is the lightest signal — pedigree alone should never outrank a provider who clearly specializes in OCD.

The cap rule

No provider can score above a certain threshold without using ERP as their primary treatment. Even with perfect scores on every other signal, a provider who doesn’t use ERP cannot be recommended for OCD care. This is non-negotiable.

Every score is human-reviewed. No pay-to-rank. Sources are cited on each provider profile.
Find your match